The Apple-vs-Google-vs-EveryoneElseInTheWorld patent battle has gotten beyond ridiculous.
I just read that Apple’s latest patent victory is for:
A portable electronic device displays, on a touch screen display, a user interface for a phone application during a phone call. In response to detecting activation of a menu icon or menu button, the UI for the phone application is replaced with a menu of application icons, while maintaining the phone call. In response to detecting a finger gesture on a non-telephone service application icon, displaying a user interface for the non-telephone service application while continuing to maintain the phone call, the UI for the non-telephone service application including a switch application icon that is not displayed in the UI when there is no ongoing phone call. In response to detecting a finger gesture on the switch application icon, replacing display of the UI for the non-telephone service application with a respective UI for the phone application while continuing to maintain the phone call.
In plain English – Apple has patented the feature where you can switch to another app on a device while maintaining a phone call. Considering that the phone system on an iPhone is, itself, an app on the device this means that Apple has laid the foundation for patenting the ability to switch from one app to another without turning either one off.
Haven’t we been doing this for years already?
Does the fact that one of the apps is a phone app really make this a unique, non-obvious invention or innovation?
I would argue no. And even though I am not a lawyer, I stick by that argument.
Nothing in Apple’s patent application seems to be anything more than an “ante-in” offering for any sophisticated electronic device. The fact that they can now, legally, prevent other software developers from releasing a feature we already have, use, and expect from even entry-level offerings is, in a word, laughable.
My prediction: Apple’s next patent attempt is for a handheld computer capable of also making phone calls. Really, that patent would be no less legitimate than the one they were just awarded …


