<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Mindshare Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mindsharestrategy.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com</link>
	<description>Tell your own story ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:57:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-alpha-19854</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress XML-RPC – MetaWeblog API by dealsvista</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2010/wp-xmlrpc-metaweblog/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>dealsvista</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Feb 2012 03:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3055#comment-681</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t help saying thank you so much. This has saved me so much time. I can&#039;t believe that there is no official documents on this thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t help saying thank you so much. This has saved me so much time. I can&#8217;t believe that there is no official documents on this thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Bob</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-680</guid>
		<description>You are an awesome writer. I&#039;d want to &#039;ave loads of cash to invest in the film adaptation :)
I think getting a copy of the book would be an awesome goodie. Having a character written in for a supporter would be a pretty big prize (500-1000+)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an awesome writer. I&#8217;d want to &#8216;ave loads of cash to invest in the film adaptation <img src='http://mindsharestrategy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
I think getting a copy of the book would be an awesome goodie. Having a character written in for a supporter would be a pretty big prize (500-1000+)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Sergio</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Sergio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-679</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s very interesting.
Also, it&#039;s so different that the my first thoughts about it are negative, because I&#039;m so used to what works and others do, that I can only see the features this new media would lack of.

I look forward to see a short-example of it. Even if depends on me scrambling the parts in a static ajax&#039;ed page.

I think something you could develop as a product ( &quot;create a dependency for free, and then sell the solution&quot; :) ) could be the statistics to understand the recorded data of the exact sequence every person have read the story, so you can provide the author with &quot;best seller&quot; versions of their own story!
That&#039;d be an extra marketing and SEO project, but one that will pay itself.

At a first glance, I see there there are reasons people keeps reading a novel won&#039;t be here.
For example, in order to have all parts live at any moment, each of the smaller parts (chapters?, paragraphs?) should contains the whole format, as TV series: all the characters should appear, all the same gags making up the personality of each character, or you couldn&#039;t grab who&#039;s the selfish or the greedy in each part without knowing the other parts.
Also, the brain has limitations. The mind couldn&#039;t keep the whole story &quot;live&quot; regardless of the way you present it. Forgetting and forgiving are techniques our mind use to keep going without getting stressed (forget my lack of vocabulary on physiologic subjects)
The reason why we get carried away by writer&#039;s waves, forgiving the &quot;bad guy&quot; on episode 3 to feel stupid on episode 9 when he stops playing a good boy to go back to its instinctive evilness, is because that need to look forward and free-up some memory for the next events.

Although, everything has a solution and there&#039;s no way to evaluate the results if you don&#039;t do it. In any case, it will be the needed step for new media to be born.

The system with the notecards works well. My mother was an astrologer, a serious one, and she used to analyze a person&#039;s chart with notes in cards, because that&#039;s kind of how the relations between planets and your life is: It&#039;s not a string that pulls you inevitably to do something but a lot of clues you can sort like words in a sentence. The magic of the process is that a good astrologer puts the words in such an order that matches what will happen (and happened at any time of your life) and the bad astrologer just quotes the good one and makes up what he can&#039;t hehe.
It&#039;s difficult to explain people what real astrology is, but basically it&#039;s just statistics. It&#039;s not 12 kind of people as a magazine wants you to believe, but 12 signs x 10 planets x 10 houses powered to 10 because the planets could be related to the other 9 in 3 different angle constrains.

Anyway, right there you have a story, and regardless of how you (magically) put the pieces together, all of them form a person&#039;s (chances of) destiny.

Let us know when there&#039;s something we can taste!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s very interesting.<br />
Also, it&#8217;s so different that the my first thoughts about it are negative, because I&#8217;m so used to what works and others do, that I can only see the features this new media would lack of.</p>
<p>I look forward to see a short-example of it. Even if depends on me scrambling the parts in a static ajax&#8217;ed page.</p>
<p>I think something you could develop as a product ( &#8220;create a dependency for free, and then sell the solution&#8221; <img src='http://mindsharestrategy.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  ) could be the statistics to understand the recorded data of the exact sequence every person have read the story, so you can provide the author with &#8220;best seller&#8221; versions of their own story!<br />
That&#8217;d be an extra marketing and SEO project, but one that will pay itself.</p>
<p>At a first glance, I see there there are reasons people keeps reading a novel won&#8217;t be here.<br />
For example, in order to have all parts live at any moment, each of the smaller parts (chapters?, paragraphs?) should contains the whole format, as TV series: all the characters should appear, all the same gags making up the personality of each character, or you couldn&#8217;t grab who&#8217;s the selfish or the greedy in each part without knowing the other parts.<br />
Also, the brain has limitations. The mind couldn&#8217;t keep the whole story &#8220;live&#8221; regardless of the way you present it. Forgetting and forgiving are techniques our mind use to keep going without getting stressed (forget my lack of vocabulary on physiologic subjects)<br />
The reason why we get carried away by writer&#8217;s waves, forgiving the &#8220;bad guy&#8221; on episode 3 to feel stupid on episode 9 when he stops playing a good boy to go back to its instinctive evilness, is because that need to look forward and free-up some memory for the next events.</p>
<p>Although, everything has a solution and there&#8217;s no way to evaluate the results if you don&#8217;t do it. In any case, it will be the needed step for new media to be born.</p>
<p>The system with the notecards works well. My mother was an astrologer, a serious one, and she used to analyze a person&#8217;s chart with notes in cards, because that&#8217;s kind of how the relations between planets and your life is: It&#8217;s not a string that pulls you inevitably to do something but a lot of clues you can sort like words in a sentence. The magic of the process is that a good astrologer puts the words in such an order that matches what will happen (and happened at any time of your life) and the bad astrologer just quotes the good one and makes up what he can&#8217;t hehe.<br />
It&#8217;s difficult to explain people what real astrology is, but basically it&#8217;s just statistics. It&#8217;s not 12 kind of people as a magazine wants you to believe, but 12 signs x 10 planets x 10 houses powered to 10 because the planets could be related to the other 9 in 3 different angle constrains.</p>
<p>Anyway, right there you have a story, and regardless of how you (magically) put the pieces together, all of them form a person&#8217;s (chances of) destiny.</p>
<p>Let us know when there&#8217;s something we can taste!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Richard</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 06:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-677</guid>
		<description>Eric,
I like the overall idea.  My reference to the platform comes from Star Wars where they &quot;went back in time to hep explain the current conditions&quot;.  You certainly could do that.

When I look at the sequence of the books of the Bible, they are not chronological, but the relationship between them is critical.

So, I think your offering an &quot;option&quot; of going back to understand &quot;why&quot; can be great.  If you make it an option, then the reader gets to dig as deep as they want.  If they want to scan over the book for now, they can pick it up later and dig for the details -- all at no cost to the overall book.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,<br />
I like the overall idea.  My reference to the platform comes from Star Wars where they &#8220;went back in time to hep explain the current conditions&#8221;.  You certainly could do that.</p>
<p>When I look at the sequence of the books of the Bible, they are not chronological, but the relationship between them is critical.</p>
<p>So, I think your offering an &#8220;option&#8221; of going back to understand &#8220;why&#8221; can be great.  If you make it an option, then the reader gets to dig as deep as they want.  If they want to scan over the book for now, they can pick it up later and dig for the details &#8212; all at no cost to the overall book.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Publish a WordPress Plugin &#8211; Subversion by Jon Hudghton</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2011/how-to-publish-a-wordpress-plugin-subversion/#comment-675</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hudghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3395#comment-675</guid>
		<description>Just wanted to say thank you for the fantastic guide! Had my first Wordpress plugin approved and was kind of stuck how to set up svn on my home Windows PC and get it working properly, but your steps made it a breeze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to say thank you for the fantastic guide! Had my first WordPress plugin approved and was kind of stuck how to set up svn on my home Windows PC and get it working properly, but your steps made it a breeze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Eric</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-674</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 04:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-674</guid>
		<description>Not every element would be rearrangable.  (Is that a word?)  I see a story as a composite of several different  threads or trains of thought.  Certain things need to happen in a certain order, but you can pull those threads apart and reorder them amongst one another.

So you&#039;ll always discover that Victor is the monster towards the end of the story, but conversations that enrich the narrative but have no immediate effect on this revelation can happen in different orders throughout the story.

Oh, and I have ideas for how to do this that won&#039;t slow down the writing process &lt;i&gt;too&lt;/i&gt; much.  I actually write in this style already ... but it involves hundreds of note cards and is a bit clunky as a process.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not every element would be rearrangable.  (Is that a word?)  I see a story as a composite of several different  threads or trains of thought.  Certain things need to happen in a certain order, but you can pull those threads apart and reorder them amongst one another.</p>
<p>So you&#8217;ll always discover that Victor is the monster towards the end of the story, but conversations that enrich the narrative but have no immediate effect on this revelation can happen in different orders throughout the story.</p>
<p>Oh, and I have ideas for how to do this that won&#8217;t slow down the writing process <i>too</i> much.  I actually write in this style already &#8230; but it involves hundreds of note cards and is a bit clunky as a process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Erin Grace</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-673</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin Grace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-673</guid>
		<description>Mind. Blown.

Unfortunately, I have a couple problems with the idea. You mentioned how a story could be slowly unfolded like a painting. The problem with this metaphor is that a painting exists to be viewed in it&#039;s final form rather than as a process. This is the same for a story. Although it&#039;s theoretically possible to simply rearrange elements in a story, the author will lose the power to give certain elements power or nuance, since there&#039;s no way to know that the reader will be able to hearken back to a specific scene or phrase. Imagine reading &quot;Frankenstein&quot; like this. We have the ability to know right up front that Victor is the monster and that the Creature is the real human; everything after that realization is monotonous, because it was originally put there to set up a contrast that&#039;s now front-loaded to us.

In addition to this, and precisely because of it, I can&#039;t help but think that writing such a story - that could be rearranged on the fly with no loss of impact or quality - would be almost impossibly hard to write. Rather than helping to bring good books to readers faster, the author would have to make sure that all possible iterations have impact and meaning, which would take a very, very long time and slow down the already slow writing process to a snail&#039;s pace.

That said, I don&#039;t think that you should give up the idea.

One could argue that comics and movies are essentially the same in that they&#039;re visual media that tell a story, but the experience of reading a comic and watching a movie are completely different. A movie director has speed to his advantage, while the comic writer has slowness. A movie director has movement while a comic writer has the ability to pick out detail in a subtle but clear way that doesn&#039;t translate well to movies. Alan Moore has expounded on this extensively.

So what I think you&#039;re really looking to do is not so much update a current medium as you are trying to create an entirely new art form. Because of that, I have no idea what to suggest to you. But I do wish you luck. It sounds AWESOME.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind. Blown.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, I have a couple problems with the idea. You mentioned how a story could be slowly unfolded like a painting. The problem with this metaphor is that a painting exists to be viewed in it&#8217;s final form rather than as a process. This is the same for a story. Although it&#8217;s theoretically possible to simply rearrange elements in a story, the author will lose the power to give certain elements power or nuance, since there&#8217;s no way to know that the reader will be able to hearken back to a specific scene or phrase. Imagine reading &#8220;Frankenstein&#8221; like this. We have the ability to know right up front that Victor is the monster and that the Creature is the real human; everything after that realization is monotonous, because it was originally put there to set up a contrast that&#8217;s now front-loaded to us.</p>
<p>In addition to this, and precisely because of it, I can&#8217;t help but think that writing such a story &#8211; that could be rearranged on the fly with no loss of impact or quality &#8211; would be almost impossibly hard to write. Rather than helping to bring good books to readers faster, the author would have to make sure that all possible iterations have impact and meaning, which would take a very, very long time and slow down the already slow writing process to a snail&#8217;s pace.</p>
<p>That said, I don&#8217;t think that you should give up the idea.</p>
<p>One could argue that comics and movies are essentially the same in that they&#8217;re visual media that tell a story, but the experience of reading a comic and watching a movie are completely different. A movie director has speed to his advantage, while the comic writer has slowness. A movie director has movement while a comic writer has the ability to pick out detail in a subtle but clear way that doesn&#8217;t translate well to movies. Alan Moore has expounded on this extensively.</p>
<p>So what I think you&#8217;re really looking to do is not so much update a current medium as you are trying to create an entirely new art form. Because of that, I have no idea what to suggest to you. But I do wish you luck. It sounds AWESOME.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Mike Bijon</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Bijon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 00:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-671</guid>
		<description>Your platform would provide on-demand interaction with the characters, details, back stories, etc in a way that &quot;interactive CDs&quot; promised ages ago, but never delivered. They never delivered because most companies selling them were more interested in volume than in the art and soul of the story or information (sadly there are deep parallels in commercial blogging and the failure of trackbacks today).

To me, this will be less about the platform and more about the story. Without the energy required to give a story &quot;soul&quot; something like this will only make any gaps or suspensions or disbelief more apparent.

But, if the story is well-crafted then it&#039;s certainly worth supporting. What would warrant my support on Kickstarter is how well you tell the platform&#039;s story on there. A polished Kickstarter project would help support that you could demop for others how to build art on a platform like that.

(Keep in mind that a platform like this would also be perfect for self-directed learning. On-demand topic changes and supporting info would help to make dull subjects interesting.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your platform would provide on-demand interaction with the characters, details, back stories, etc in a way that &#8220;interactive CDs&#8221; promised ages ago, but never delivered. They never delivered because most companies selling them were more interested in volume than in the art and soul of the story or information (sadly there are deep parallels in commercial blogging and the failure of trackbacks today).</p>
<p>To me, this will be less about the platform and more about the story. Without the energy required to give a story &#8220;soul&#8221; something like this will only make any gaps or suspensions or disbelief more apparent.</p>
<p>But, if the story is well-crafted then it&#8217;s certainly worth supporting. What would warrant my support on Kickstarter is how well you tell the platform&#8217;s story on there. A polished Kickstarter project would help support that you could demop for others how to build art on a platform like that.</p>
<p>(Keep in mind that a platform like this would also be perfect for self-directed learning. On-demand topic changes and supporting info would help to make dull subjects interesting.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on WordPress XML-RPC – MetaWeblog API by Didier</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2010/wp-xmlrpc-metaweblog/#comment-670</link>
		<dc:creator>Didier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 18:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3055#comment-670</guid>
		<description>After two days discovering Wordpress XML-RPC the hard way, I finally found your post. Thank you very much, it saved me a lot of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After two days discovering WordPress XML-RPC the hard way, I finally found your post. Thank you very much, it saved me a lot of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Kickstarter Proposal by Jeff Mayernik</title>
		<link>http://mindsharestrategy.com/2012/kickstarter-proposal/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Mayernik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mindsharestrategy.com/?p=3984#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Eric,  think you&#039;re on the right track with the proposal. I would look for a timeline for phase one/book one of the Novel to be completed in order to set a funding requirement. Is it 10 hours per week for 6 months or is it an all-consuming 30 day project?

I would support the project (as written) at some level but I&#039;m not really a &#039;perk collector&#039; so couldn&#039;t suggest goodies to offer. I&#039;m also a &#039;little money to lots of projects&#039; kind of guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric,  think you&#8217;re on the right track with the proposal. I would look for a timeline for phase one/book one of the Novel to be completed in order to set a funding requirement. Is it 10 hours per week for 6 months or is it an all-consuming 30 day project?</p>
<p>I would support the project (as written) at some level but I&#8217;m not really a &#8216;perk collector&#8217;so couldn&#8217;t suggest goodies to offer. I&#8217;m also a &#8216;little money to lots of projects&#8217;kind of guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

